 |
Christian Name Commonality,
1851 Names,
1861 Names,
1871 Names,
1881 Names,
1891 Names,
1901 Names,
1999 Names,
1999 All Names
|
|
By standardising the spelling and abbreviations, it is possible to determine the number of instances of occurence of
christian names - taking the only the first name when an individual has multiple christian names.
Dividing by the number of individuals of the same gender allows a separate comparison of the commonality of male and female names.
Of course, by including married women, a significant proportion (but less than 50%) of the womens names were not assigned to
them by Glanville family members, but by their maiden family parents.
Thus this analysis (for womans names) hovers between names assigned by the population as a whole, and
names assigned by Glanvilles.
|
|
|
For Glanvil(le) names in the 1851 census (England, Wales,
Channel Islands, Isle of Man), this yields the following:-
74 different male names were found, with 104 different female names in use.
Some single instance male names were Forest, David, Burgess and Adolphus; whilst some of the single
instance female names were Annette, Cybele, Ginefor (Jennifer) and Lusia.
36 of the mens names were found only once - 49% of their names
48 of the womans names were found only once - 45% of their names
|
|
|
The Glanvil(le) names in the 1861 census (England, Wales, Channel Islands, Isle of Man),
yields the following:-
61 different male names were found, with 89 different female names in use.
Some single instance male names were Usher, Vivian, and Walter; whilst some of the single instance female names
were Clementine, Rosetta and Nance.
30 of the mens names were found only once - 49% of their names
36 of the womans names were found only once - 40% of their names
|
|
|
The Glanvil(le) names in the 1871 census (England, Wales, Channel Islands, Isle of Man),
yields the following:-
73 different male names were found, with 100 different female names in use.
Some single instance male names were Alfonse, Owen and Wilfred; whilst some of the single instance female names
were Rosa, Phillis, and Naomi.
31 of the mens names were found only once - 42% of their names
47 of the womans names were found only once - 47% of their names
|
|
|
For Glanvil(le) names in the 1881 census (England, Wales and Scotland), this yields the following:-
82 different male names were found, with 122 different female names in use.
Amongst the single instances of male names were Lorenzo, Silvanus, Fletcher and Deeble; whilst amongst the
women were Temperance, Selina, Floreska and Aletha.
38 of the mens names were found only once - 46% of their names
48 of the womans names were found only once - 39% of their names
|
|
|
For Glanvil(le) names in the 1891 census (England, Wales and Scotland), this yields the following:-
94 different male names were found, with 141 different female names in use.
38 of the mens names were found only once - 40% of their names
58 of the womans names were found only once - 41% of their names
|
|
|
For Glanvil(le) names in the 1901 census (England, Wales), this yields the following:-
112 different male names were found, with 191 different female names in use.
59 of the mens names were found only once - 52% of their names
97 of the womans names were found only once - 51% of their names
|
|
|
For Glanvil(le) names by 1999 (excluding individuals aged under 16 - thus for womans names this veers
even more towards maiden names than in 18811), the following was found:-
184 different male names were found, with 312 female names. These numbers are less certain than
in 1881 as unisex names are starting to appear (e.g. Terry, Jay, Dee, Toni), immigrant names of
uncertain gender, as well as deliberate (assumed deliberate from the fact that literacy is higher than in 1881) spelling
variations that ought not to be normalised (e.g. Brigit, Brigitte, Bridget). Additionally the source for this was
not a census but a combination of Electorall Roll and Telephone Directory - and as such people had a different
approach to the formality on how they wish to appear (e.g. Natasha, Tasha, Tash; Reginald, Reg, Reggie).
73 of the mens names were found only once - 40% of their names
154 of the womans names were found only once - 49% of their names
1 Given the elimination of girls under 16, and Glanville-born women married to other men, you're
left mostly with woman married to Glanville men - and thus one might use this table to support a hypothesis
that prior to 1999 Glanville men had a genetic predisposition to marry woman named Margaret ! ! !
|
|
This table shows names registered by the whole (National) population, not just those by Glanville parents.
This information is published by the Office of National Statistics
| Top National First Names by Year, for England/Wales |
|
|
1904 |
1934 |
1964 |
1994 |
1999 |
| Males |
1st |
William |
John |
David |
Thomas |
Jack |
|
2nd |
John |
Peter |
Paul |
James |
Thomas |
|
3rd |
George |
William |
Andrew |
Jack |
James |
|
4th |
Thomas |
Brian |
Mark |
Daniel |
Daniel |
|
5th |
Arthur |
David |
John |
Matthew |
Joshua |
| Females |
1st |
Mary |
Margaret |
Susan |
Rebecca |
Chloe |
|
2nd |
Florence |
Jean |
Julie |
Lauren |
Emily |
|
3rd |
Doris |
Mary |
Karen |
Jessica |
Megan |
|
4th |
Edith |
Joan |
Jacqueline |
Charlotte |
Jessica |
|
5th |
Dorothy |
Patricia |
Deborah |
Hannah |
Sophie |
Note the distinction between the earlier analyses which were on everyone alive
in those years, and the ONS figures which show the commonality of new names being
registered to infants in that year only (and hence cannot be compared directly).
|
|