Glanville Coat of Arms

What's In A Name Glanville

    
 

Email Jay Glanville 

 
   
 
Christian Name Commonality, 1851 Names, 1861 Names, 1871 Names, 1881 Names, 1891 Names, 1901 Names, 1999 Names, 1999 All Names

Christian Name Commonality

By standardising the spelling and abbreviations, it is possible to determine the number of instances of occurence of christian names - taking the only the first name when an individual has multiple christian names.

Dividing by the number of individuals of the same gender allows a separate comparison of the commonality of male and female names.

Of course, by including married women, a significant proportion (but less than 50%) of the womens names were not assigned to them by Glanville family members, but by their maiden family parents.
Thus this analysis (for womans names) hovers between names assigned by the population as a whole, and names assigned by Glanvilles.

1851

For Glanvil(le) names in the 1851 census (England, Wales, Channel Islands, Isle of Man), this yields the following:-

Top 10 male names found in the 1851 census Top 10 female names found in the 1851 census

74 different male names were found, with 104 different female names in use.
Some single instance male names were Forest, David, Burgess and Adolphus; whilst some of the single instance female names were Annette, Cybele, Ginefor (Jennifer) and Lusia.

36 of the mens names were found only once - 49% of their names
48 of the womans names were found only once - 45% of their names

1861

The Glanvil(le) names in the 1861 census (England, Wales, Channel Islands, Isle of Man), yields the following:-

Top 10 male names found in the 1861 census Top 10 female names found in the 1861 census

61 different male names were found, with 89 different female names in use.
Some single instance male names were Usher, Vivian, and Walter; whilst some of the single instance female names were Clementine, Rosetta and Nance.

30 of the mens names were found only once - 49% of their names
36 of the womans names were found only once - 40% of their names

1871

The Glanvil(le) names in the 1871 census (England, Wales, Channel Islands, Isle of Man), yields the following:-

Top 10 male names found in the 1871 census Top 10 female names found in the 1871 census

73 different male names were found, with 100 different female names in use.
Some single instance male names were Alfonse, Owen and Wilfred; whilst some of the single instance female names were Rosa, Phillis, and Naomi.

31 of the mens names were found only once - 42% of their names
47 of the womans names were found only once - 47% of their names

1881

For Glanvil(le) names in the 1881 census (England, Wales and Scotland), this yields the following:-

Top 10 male names found in the 1881 census Top 10 female names found in the 1881 census

82 different male names were found, with 122 different female names in use.
Amongst the single instances of male names were Lorenzo, Silvanus, Fletcher and Deeble; whilst amongst the women were Temperance, Selina, Floreska and Aletha.

38 of the mens names were found only once - 46% of their names
48 of the womans names were found only once - 39% of their names

1891

For Glanvil(le) names in the 1891 census (England, Wales and Scotland), this yields the following:-

Top 10 male names found in the 1891 census Top 10 female names found in the 1891 census

94 different male names were found, with 141 different female names in use.

38 of the mens names were found only once - 40% of their names
58 of the womans names were found only once - 41% of their names

1901

For Glanvil(le) names in the 1901 census (England, Wales), this yields the following:-

Top 10 male names found in the 1901 census Top 10 female names found in the 1901 census

112 different male names were found, with 191 different female names in use.

59 of the mens names were found only once - 52% of their names
97 of the womans names were found only once - 51% of their names

1999

For Glanvil(le) names by 1999 (excluding individuals aged under 16 - thus for womans names this veers even more towards maiden names than in 18811), the following was found:-

Top 10 male names found in 1999 Top 10 female names found in 1999

184 different male names were found, with 312 female names. These numbers are less certain than in 1881 as unisex names are starting to appear (e.g. Terry, Jay, Dee, Toni), immigrant names of uncertain gender, as well as deliberate (assumed deliberate from the fact that literacy is higher than in 1881) spelling variations that ought not to be normalised (e.g. Brigit, Brigitte, Bridget). Additionally the source for this was not a census but a combination of Electorall Roll and Telephone Directory - and as such people had a different approach to the formality on how they wish to appear (e.g. Natasha, Tasha, Tash; Reginald, Reg, Reggie).

73 of the mens names were found only once - 40% of their names
154 of the womans names were found only once - 49% of their names

1 Given the elimination of girls under 16, and Glanville-born women married to other men, you're left mostly with woman married to Glanville men - and thus one might use this table to support a hypothesis that prior to 1999 Glanville men had a genetic predisposition to marry woman named Margaret ! ! !

1999 All Surnames

This table shows names registered by the whole (National) population, not just those by Glanville parents.
This information is published by the Office of National Statistics

Top National First Names by Year, for England/Wales
1904 1934 1964 1994 1999
  Males 1st William John David Thomas Jack
2nd John Peter Paul James Thomas
3rd George William Andrew Jack James
4th Thomas Brian Mark Daniel Daniel
5th Arthur David John Matthew Joshua
  Females 1st Mary Margaret Susan Rebecca Chloe
2nd Florence Jean Julie Lauren Emily
3rd Doris Mary Karen Jessica Megan
4th Edith Joan Jacqueline Charlotte Jessica
5th Dorothy Patricia Deborah Hannah Sophie
Note the distinction between the earlier analyses which were on everyone alive in those years, and the ONS figures which show the commonality of new names being registered to infants in that year only (and hence cannot be compared directly).


Page Created: 28-Mar-2004
Page Modified: 6-Dec-2005

Quick Navigation: